Back to overview

EU Taxonomy

Less coordination effort, more reporting confidence – for organisations that want to use the EU Taxonomy strategically.

The EU Taxonomy requires all companies subject to the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) to assess their economic activities against an EU-wide classification system and disclose the KPIs revenue, CapEx, and OpEx transparently. The requirement sits at the intersection of two worlds: sustainability managers must interpret financial data, while controlling teams must apply sustainability criteria – neither falls naturally within their core competency.

Without clear responsibilities and a shared language, friction, delays, and reporting risks arise. Organisations that approach the EU Taxonomy in a structured way, however, achieve more than compliance – they create transparency that convinces investors and informs strategic decisions.

Get in touch

Why You Should Act Now

  • Actively avoiding reporting risks: Without clear responsibilities between controlling and the sustainability department, data gaps, delays, and auditor requests arise. Robust documentation protects you from follow-up requests – today and in future reporting cycles.
  • Securing access to capital: Taxonomy-aligned organisations gain a measurable advantage in accessing Green Finance instruments. Investors and banks increasingly use Taxonomy KPIs as a basis for their decisions.
  • Focus on what matters: A pragmatic approach avoids overengineering and concentrates effort precisely where it delivers the greatest regulatory and strategic impact – taking into account the materiality threshold under the Omnibus regulation.

Start now

Our Approach: Turning Taxonomy Complexity into Clear Steps

With over five years of EU Taxonomy project experience, we know the typical pitfalls – and how to avoid them. Our ambition goes beyond compliance: we enable your team to manage the requirements independently in future reporting cycles.

Stakeholder Alignment and Enablement 

From the outset, we bring together all relevant stakeholders from sustainability, controlling, and the business units. Together, we define the project objective, responsibilities, and level of ambition: is the goal to fulfil the reporting obligation – or to use the EU Taxonomy as a strategic instrument? This decision shapes the entire process.

Taxonomy Eligibility: Systematically Mapping Economic Activities

We analyse your business activities and systematically map them to the EU Taxonomy's economic activities. The result is a clear picture: which activities are taxonomy-eligible – and which fall below the materiality threshold under the Omnibus regulation? This screening forms the foundation for all subsequent steps and creates clarity for the sustainability department, business units, and controlling alike.

Taxonomy Alignment: Assessing and Documenting Technical Criteria

For each taxonomy-eligible activity, we work with the relevant business units to assess whether the technical screening criteria are met – from the substantial contribution to the Do No Significant Harm (DNSH) criteria. For minimum safeguards, we analyse whether company-wide standards or due diligence processes exist for human rights, competition, corruption, and taxation. Results are documented in structured gap analyses – transparent, traceable, and audit-ready.

Data Collection and KPI Calculation

The calculation of the Taxonomy KPIs – revenue, CapEx, and OpEx – depends entirely on the quality of the underlying data. Together with controlling, we develop tailored data collection templates that enable targeted and efficient data capture – taking into account the materiality threshold under the Omnibus regulation.

Process Documentation and Reporting Text

At the end of the process, a complete, audit-ready report is in place: we consolidate all results into a structured process description and support the drafting of reporting texts for the sustainability report. We also manage the coordination with the auditing firm and ensure their feedback is integrated smoothly.

Taxonomy, CSRD and More 

The EU Taxonomy and CSRD are two sides of the same coin – for large organisations, they are inseparable. Taxonomy KPIs feed directly into the CSRD-compliant sustainability report. Sustainable guides you through the full package: from the Double Materiality Assessment through the EU Taxonomy to the completed sustainability report under ESRS – consistent, efficient, and audit-ready.

Climate Risk Analysis: The DNSH criterion for climate adaptation requires evidence that an economic activity does not impair climate resilience. We conduct the required analysis together with you – methodologically sound and audit-ready. 

More about Climate Risk Analysis

Product Carbon Footprint (PCF): Certain taxonomy-eligible activities require evidence of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions at the product level – via a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) or a PCF. We support you with accounting, methodology selection, and audit preparation. (

More about Product Carbon Footprint

CSRD: The EU Taxonomy and CSRD are directly interlinked. As part of our full reporting package, we ensure both requirements are met consistently and efficiently.

More about CSRD

sustainable logo dark

Why Companies Choose to Work with Us

Extensive experience

We know the typical pitfalls from numerous projects – and guide you safely past them.

Enablement over dependency

We build internal competency so your team can manage reporting independently in future years.

All from one source

The EU Taxonomy and CSRD are inseparably linked – we guide you through the full package, consistently and audit-ready.

Kreishintergrund

Is your Taxonomy data foundation ready for the CSRD? We start with a structured gap analysis and show you in an initial meeting where action is needed. Schedule a meeting.


* These fields must be filled.

Markus Goetz Kreishintergrund
Your contact person
Markus Goetz
Director
T

+49 (160) 82 13 61 4

sustainable logo dark
Services
sustainable AG management consulting
Deutschland